The difference between Bitcoin and Bittensor’s incentive mechanism… Yuma Consensus…

The difference between Bitcoin and Bittensor's incentive mechanism
Listen to this article
Read Time:25 Second

SUMMARY: Siam Kidd explains how Bittensor’s Yuma Consensus mechanism distributes TAO token rewards across miners, validators, and subnet stakeholders, contrasting Bitcoin’s sole focus on miners for network security via proof-of-work. The video highlights Bittensor’s “proof of useful work” model, where 128 specialized AI subnets compete to produce intelligence outputs like image generation or data labeling, using market-driven token stakes to rank quality and prevent validator bias, unlike Bitcoin’s binary puzzle-solving.

By: Siam Kidd

Subscribe to receive The Tao daily content in your inbox.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*